Management high performance ip5 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

The board elite ip5 - Essay Example This is the second point that will be talked about in the gathering, which will appear as disclosing to the representatives the dispiriting and belittling impacts of working environment threats on the representatives (Simlin, 2006). The manager will clarify the effect of the representative threats as a contributing element to poor departmental execution, since the workers are crippled by the threatening vibe and caused to feel neglected. This thus brings down their eagerness and vitality, making them less profitable (Harold and Kumar, 2012). This is the third point that will be talked about by the manager, planned for helping the worker comprehend the ideal authoritative estimations of the manufacturing plant comparable to work environment morals and social decent variety. Such qualities make the production line utilize laborers from various strict and social foundation without separating (Rodriguez, 2006). The chief will clarify the estimation of assorted variety inside a working environment in upgrading efficiency and execution. The director will likewise clarify the obligation and duty of the workers to grasp the authoritative qualities, and as such stop the threats (Simlin, 2006). Government Communications Commission (FCC). (2009). Understanding Workplace Harassment: Workplace Harassment is a Form of Discrimination. Recovered March 15, 2014 from

TEXT TAX OPPOSITION essays

Content TAX OPPOSITION papers Essentially every country is working at a shortfall nowadays. Each legislature is attempting to discover new wellsprings of salary in these intense occasions, however our country might be the primary spot to go to content informing. Cebu City Councilor Sylvan, Chairman of the Committee on Communication of the Cebu City Council is contrary to the national governments plan. I think individuals have been burdened enough. I dont figure we ought to permit the expansion of duties for content informing since its as of now such a great amount with respect to the Filipinos, he said. Jakosalem brought up the significance of short informing administration (SMS) in correspondence. What they should burden on are those for cigarettes, mixed drinks and different things that Filipinos dont truly need, he responded. The Philippines has an expected 28 million cell phone supporters, and industry gauges said they expect half of the 84 million populaces to claim a handset before the following year's over. With 120 to 150 million messages crossing cell phone organizes every day, the Philippines has been labeled as the content capital of the world. Since Telecommunications organizations get gigantic benefits with SMS and was among the eight expense estimates President Gloria Arroyo requested that Congress spend a month ago to help restricted the shortfall, which in the main half arrived at 80.1 billion pesos (1.43 billion dollars), surpassing an administration set roof. Speaker Jose de Venecia has reported that Congress will just build the establishment charges forced to media communications organizations as opposed to forcing extra to SMS. In any case, Councilor Jackosalem said that the organizations didn't know to expand the cost of messaging when more significant expense will forced to them and guaranteed that establishment duty won't be passed to portable subcribers. Relationship of Concerned Texters (ACT), a customer bunch drove a content crusade in Cebu to decry to burden cell phone content informing or SMS. ... <!

ZigZag 10

ZigZag 10 Episode 10 of MITs video podcast, ZigZag, has been released. It contains a piece about the annual Freshman Photograph, the Kendall Square BioBash, and the fire truck hack. My favorite piece, though, is about the Orientation Activities Midway; I loved getting to talk to students and hear all about their groups. Check it out! WARNING: The host (me) is wearing a very video unfriendly shirt in this vodcast! (youve been warned) [click on the image to watch ZigZag] If you like ZigZag and would like to get it automatically in your iTunes, you can subscribe to the iTunes Podcast. If youd like to subscribe and use a podcatcher other than iTunes, copy this URL and paste into your podcatcher: http://vodcast.mit.edu/zigzag/main/rss.xml Also today in video podcasts: Amanda Across America features MIT artist Pia Lindman. Check it out. Finally today in videos from across the web, Weird Als new video has an MIT mention (First in my class here at MIT, he sings, apparently unaware that we have no class rank or valedictorian). Anyway, White Nerdy is a parody of Ridin' (Ridin Dirty) by Chamillionaire, and is seriously funny. Check it out. Okay, thats enough distractions enjoy!

Comparing the Peaceweavers - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1512 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2019/05/08 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Beowulf Essay Did you like this example? Comparing the Peaceweavers and the Hell Brides in Beowulf Throughout the British Literature time period of 450-1066: the roles and perspective of women were very subjective in the idea that a woman needs a man to be powerful. An independent woman was viewed as weak and unimportant. The belief that a man good fix or heal an evil/ bad women was a common belief. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Comparing the Peaceweavers" essay for you Create order By looking at the different roles Women play in Beowulf, women either have to be good or evil, there is no middle or in-between, to be good they seem to have to be affiliated with a man. Throughout the poem, there are several women Characters from Wealhtheow to Grendels Mother. While some are shown to be nice and loving others such as Grendels mom are portrayed as demonic monsters. The poet and novelist George Meredith said that every society must have its civilization judged by the way it treats its women: what happens in bodily fact, and also what is said, felt, imagined and fantasize by and about them. Sometimes there is a wide gap between fact and fancy(Herbert 1997). The two queens in Beowulf, Wealhtheow, and Hygd are married to the Kings Hrothgar and Hygela both queens take up the important jobs of cupbearer, Wealhtheow came in,Urging him to drink deep and enjoy it(Beowulf 612) and becoming Peaceweavers. A Peace weaver is a woman who married someone from an enemy tribe in order to establish peace between her family and his. The royal bride who holds out her welcome to bring warring tribes together in friendship at her wedding feast (Herbert 1997) Their main job was to see the comfort of the men and bear children(The Wifes Lament Pages). Queen Wealtheow is married to the enemy of her people, her daughters even carry drinks between the members of her own tribe and the Geats. The marriage of a peaceweaver is basically a political event but they actually do love their husbands and respect them. Now one of the Queens important jobs is to be the cupbearer what they do is carry the mead cup and pass it to the King and his warriors. This role might seem passive but its actually empowering and adds to the queens power. They will give the cup first to the king because he is the highest in rank and the first time Beowulf would be the last to recover it, however, the second time around the order went from the King to Beowulf second. Haerehts daughter moved throughout the spacious building with mead cups, cared for the people, carried flagons to drink to the hands of the Heathens. The two queens play a role in politics and do influence it. After Grendels death by Beowulf queen Wealhtheow said a speech to Hrothgar. be gracious towards the geats(1173) and she heard they told me that you wish to take the warrior to be a son to you. I would think this means he would become king one day. After the king dies Hygd tries to pass the Beowulf the crown to be King, she did not trust that her son knew how to hold the throne of his homeland against foreign nations.( Beowulf 2373-76) In old English poems, noble women would give gifts Beloved Beowulf, enjoy this collar with good fortune, and make good use of this garment. Now on the opposite side of the spectrum, lets look at how Grendels Mother is portrayed compared to the queens. So for one, she is completely isolated and lives by herself in what she calls home in a cave under a lake. She is an independent woman and has no affiliation to a man other than her son Grendel. She is portrayed as an evil demonic monster, Grendels mother, Monstrous hell-bride, brooded on her wrongs. She had been forced down into fearful waters(Beowulf 1258). She is seen as evil and independent and t just so happens she has no male affiliation attached to her. perhaps, for this reason, Grendels Mother is presented as husbandless and son-obsessed- to suggest to an Anglo-Saxon audience the dangers inherent in womans functions as friousibb pledge of peace.The author Gives Grendels mom masculine traits. And uses masculine words/phrases to describe her. Grendels mother has the form of a woman(idese onlicnes, 1351) and is weaker than a man and more cowardly, for she flees in fear for her life when discovered by Heorot. The author occasionally uses a masculine pronoun when referring to her s be instead of so be in 1260,1497 and h instead of ho in lines 1392, 1394 (Heaney Beowulf A verse Translation 1895). Modthyrth a queen who punishes anyone if they look at her the wrong way. She killed anyone that came into her hall. To look her in the face, if an eye, not her lords Stared at her directly during daylight, The outcome was sealed: he was bound In hand-tightened shackles, racked, tortured until doom was announceddeath by the sword, Slash of blade, blood gush and death qualms in an evil display(Beowulf 1934). Modthyrth is shown as an evil queen and for good reason at that. She is almost stereotyped into how she should act because shes a queen. Even a queen Outstanding in beauty must not overstep like that. A queen should weave peace, not punish the innocent(Beowulf 1940). She is compared to Hygd she is presented as a how women are supposed to behave. Hygd is described as gracious in bearing and manner, attentive to the men around her, and loyal to her husband and lord. The author makes Queen Modthryth the foil of Hygd. A foil is a character whose traits contrast with and another. Even a queen Outstanding in beauty must not overstep like that. A queen should weave peace, not punish the innocent(Beowulf 1940). Queen Modhyth and Hygd are described as different and makes Hygd seem far superior to Modhyth. It carries the same ideology that a woman is supposed to act a certain way. She will eventually stop her bad doings and settle down to marry, as soon as she boarded a boat to cross the pale waters to marry Offa according to her fathers counsel. Once there the woman worked well on the throne, renowned for goodness(Good Queen Modthryth? How marriage makes women (and men) better 2018). This holds the idea that bad woman can be fixed by a man. Queen Wealhtheow and Grendels mother are similar in that they are both mothers. Wealtheow is seen as a more superior woman compared to Grendels mom because she is a peaceweaver, cupbearer and a queen. Grendels mom lives below the earth in an empty cave underneath a lake and Wealtheow lives above land and it in a castle. So there is a clear social class gap between the two. Wealhtheow represents the good in life, mankind, and light mindful of etiquette (Beowulf 613). Grendels mom represents evil, darkness, and danger. Wealhtheow is shown as a beautiful, childlike female, Grendels mom is fat, old, and lonely. The women in Beowulf closely resemble the Anglo-Saxon woman in that they had the option to choose who they could marry. Arranged marries were however usually held in the upper class, peace-weaving marriages were considered even higher. In order to become a peace-weaver, you had to be of high class to marry another tribes king in an effort to keep the peace. Some would argue they held more power than the kings since theyre the ones keeping peace from one anothers clans. The Queens were described as how and what women should act like and be during this time period. Queen Modryth was viewed as evil and helpless and had to have a man in her life to resolve her problems. If you look closely at the end of the book the women you are married/ have a man in close relation, are viewed as better or more important. Grendels mother doesnt even have a name for crying out loud. I wonder if she was married we would know her real name. The author gives the reader a biased description of her attacks against the humans, he didnt truly state her point of view which made her seem a selfish evil monster. Monstrous hell-bride( Beowulf 1259). I wonder if he added that she was doing the same act that Beowulf was doing itd be different. I mean Beowulf is avenging the men Grendels mom killed so why is he considered a hero when he caused their deaths by killing Grendel? Although the author is unknown I would bet the author was a male, just based on the trend of women cant be good until/ unless a man is in their life. Works Cited Good Queen Modthryth? How Marriage Makes Women (and Men) Better. A Bloggers Beowulf, 5 Apr. 2018, bloggersbeowulf.com/2017/05/18/good-queen-modthryth-how-marriage-makes-women-and-men-better/. Heaney, Seamus. Beowulf: a New Verse Translation. W.W. Norton Co., 1999. Heaney, Seamus. Beowulf A Verse Translation. 1895. Herbert, Kathleen. Peace-Weavers Sheild-Maidens Women in Early English Society. Anglo-Saxon Books Frithgarth, 1997. The Wifes Lament Pages. Research at UVU, research.uvu.edu/mcdonald/Anglo-Saxon/wifeslament/wifepeacew.html.

The Battle of Pichincha

On May 24, 1822, South American rebel forces under the command of General Antonio Josà © de Sucre and Spanish forces led by Melchor Aymerich clashed on the slopes of Pichincha Volcano, within sight of the city of Quito, Ecuador. The battle was a huge victory for the rebels, destroying once and for all Spanish power in the former Royal Audience of Quito. Background By 1822, Spanish forces in South America were on the run. To the north, Simà ³n Bolà ­var had liberated the Viceroyalty of New Granada (Colombia, Venezuela, Panama, part of Ecuador) in 1819, and to the south, Josà © de San Martà ­n had liberated Argentina and Chile and was moving on Peru. The last major strongholds for royalist forces on the continent were in Peru and around Quito. Meanwhile, on the coast, the important port city of Guayaquil had declared itself independent and there were not enough Spanish forces to re-take it: instead, they decided to fortify Quito in hopes of holding out until reinforcements could arrive. First Two Attempts In late 1820, the leaders of the independence movement in Guayaquil organized a small, poorly-organized army and set out to capture Quito. Although they captured the strategic city of Cuenca on the way, they were defeated by Spanish forces at the Battle of Huachi. In 1821, Bolà ­var sent his most trusted military commander, Antonio Josà © de Sucre, to Guayaquil to organize a second attempt. Sucre raised an army and marched on Quito in July 1821, but he, too, was defeated, this time at the Second Battle of Huachi. The survivors retreated to Guayaquil to regroup. March on Quito By January 1822, Sucre was ready to try again. His new army took a different tactic, swinging through the southern highlands on its way to Quito. Cuenca was captured again, preventing communication between Quito and Lima. Sucre’s rag-tag army of approximately 1,700 consisted of a number of Ecuadorians, Colombians sent by Bolà ­var, a troop of British (mainly Scots and Irish), Spanish who had switched sides, and even some French. In February, they were reinforced by 1,300 Peruvians, Chileans and Argentines sent by San Martà ­n. By May, they had reached the city of Latacunga, less than 100 kilometers south of Quito. Slopes of the Volcano Aymerich was well aware of the army bearing down on him, and he placed his strongest forces in defensive positions along with the approach to Quito. Sucre did not want to lead his men straight into the teeth of well-fortified enemy positions, so he decided to go around them and attack from the rear. This involved marching his men partway up Cotopaxi volcano and around Spanish positions. It worked: he was able to get into the valleys behind Quito. The Battle of Pichincha On the night of May 23, Sucre ordered his men to move on Quito. He wanted them to take the high ground of Pichincha volcano, which overlooks the city. A position on Pichincha would have been difficult to assault, and Aymerich sent his royal army out to meet him. Around 9:30 in the morning, the armies clashed on the steep, muddy slopes of the volcano. Sucre’s forces had become spread out during their march, and the Spanish were able to decimate their leading battalions before the rear guard caught up. When the rebel Scots-Irish Albià ³n Battalion wiped out a Spanish elite force, the royalists were forced to retreat. Aftermath of the Battle of Pichincha The Spanish had been defeated. On May 25, Sucre entered Quito and formally accepted the surrender of all Spanish forces. Bolà ­var arrived in mid-June to joyous crowds. The battle of Pichincha would be the final warm-up for rebel forces before tackling the strongest bastion of royalists left on the continent: Peru. Although Sucre was already considered a very able commander, the Battle of Pichincha solidified his reputation as one of the top rebel military officers. One of the heroes of the battle was teenage Lieutenant Abdà ³n Calderà ³n. A native of Cuenca, Calderà ³n was wounded several times during the battle but refused to leave, fighting on despite his wounds. He died the next day and was posthumously promoted to Captain. Sucre himself singled out Calderà ³n for special mention, and today the Abdà ³n Calderà ³n star is one of the most prestigious awards given in the Ecuadorian military. There is also a park in his honor in Cuenca featuring a statue of Calderà ³n bravely fighting. The Battle of Pichincha also marks the military appearance of a most remarkable woman: Manuela Sà ¡enz. Manuela was a native quiteà ±a who had lived in Lima for a time and had been involved in the independence movement there. She joined Sucre’s forces, fighting in the battle and spending her own money on food and medicine for the troops. She was awarded the rank of lieutenant and would go on to become an important cavalry commander in subsequent battles, eventually reaching the rank of Colonel. She is better known today for what happened shortly after the war: she met Simà ³n Bolà ­var and the two fell in love. She would spend the next eight years as the Liberator’s devoted mistress until his death in 1830.

Praising Children Free Essays

Praising Children Yaren D Obando Introduction to Psychology I Praising Children The field of behaviorism has always lacked agreement and will always be a debatable subject. Nonetheless, we find ourselves in the middle of one. Whether is bad or not to praise, or frequently use positive reinforcement in our children, and its consequences of doing so or not doing so is the issue at stake here. We will write a custom essay sample on Praising Children or any similar topic only for you Order Now Both perspectives, both positions, and both sides have been well represented by the authors of each article. The fact that positive reinforcement indeed strengthens all behaviors wanted will never be proved wrong, but what I intent to do in this integrative analysis is to prove the fact that praising children, and the misuse of positive reinforcement could bring negative outcomes in them. I will do so starting with a detailed summary of each one of these articles that are being looked at, followed by a complete analysis of the evidence found in each of these arguments. Lastly a complex conclusion that will recap the main points argued in this paper, as well as how they tie in and support the final argument. Stop Saying â€Å"Good Job! † In this article, the author Kohn mainly emphasizes the importance of supporting and encouraging children and he shows us ways to do it without praising them or without using positive reinforcement. He goes on to explain with evidence, direct quote, or even with personal experiences why praising children is bad, and gives us five main reasons to support his argument. Kohn explains that we as adults that praising is a way of doing something to children to get them to comply with our wishes, and that we exploit children’s dependence for our own convenience. The author gives us the alternative to have a conversation with children that we have done or failed to do instead of praising, making children become more thoughtful people. Kohn also suggests that praise may increase kids’ dependence on us, and that the more we praise them the more they rely in our evaluations, our decisions about what’s good or bad, rather than using their own judgment which can affect their life as they grow older. He also argues that by praising kids e are indirectly telling them how to feel. Instead of letting them take delight in their own accomplishments, to feel pride in what they have learned how to do. Kohn compares the praising to a goody, and explain that children behave well just because they are trying to get the goody, and not for the fact that and acting might be good in itself alone. Praising increases pressure in children, to keep up the good work that has gotten them the goody so far. All of this gets in the way the actual kids perfo rm. Finally, Kohn ends his arguments with some advice, and a solid conclusion stating the fact that encouraging our children is great, we just have to watch the way or the motives for which we do it, and that maybe positive reinforcement isn’t so positive after all. A Bad Job with â€Å"Good Job† (A Response to Kohn) In this second article the authors, write a clearly response that disagrees with Kohns’ argument and point out all of its weaknesses. They go on to refute in the same format every single idea that Kohn presents within his articles. Rather than purposely manipulating children for adults’ convenience, praise does nothing more than encourage social graces, fine motor skills or valuable skills chosen by them in their own children. The authors go on to argue that such alternative of having a conversation with children could serve to reinforce the behavior, cause misunderstanding in the effects of certain behaviors, and also to independently generate alternative behaviors. In short, making this offered intervention alternative of minimal applicability. The authors try to refuse by mentioning the massive evidence and research done to prove that Kohns’ idea of that the more we praise, the more the kids seem to need it, so we do it more is wrong. They go on to explain that too little positive reinforcement is the reason why we have poor self-esteem and poor adult outcomes, and not the fact that we frequently praise kids as Kohn suggested. On this idea, they don’t argue that children should take pleasure in their accomplishments, but the fact of how they should take pride in those. In fact, is positive reinforcement the primary key in which children learn to take pride in them, and how positive reinforcement it is promoting the importance of children engaging in self-evaluation. For the authors in this article the â€Å"goody† is positive child outcomes, and positive reinforcement has effectively met theses ends. Also that this reinforcement increases behaviors, not decrease as Kohn suggested. They rebute the idea that good job functions decreases the behaviors that are intended to increase, since positive reinforcement only strengthens behaviors wanted. Strain and Joseph conclude their response by summarizing all of Kohns’ ideas, right away refuting all of their most important contrary ideas, and giving us food for thought. A Double Take Without a doubt, it had been more than clear that positive reinforcement will always increase a favorable behavior or outcome to be repeated in the future, this is to be true whether the reason, motive or case in which is used is right or wrong. Praise in this issue could be easily being compared to the food pellet used in The Skinner Box; subjects will always strive for the reward, no matter what’s at stake. Now let us not get distracted and really focused on the important issue, how does praise (positive reinforcement) affect children? Well, let’s look at the evidence provided. Kohn, gave us five main reasons why praising affects our kids in a negative way, on the other hand Strain and Joseph not just refuted this five reasons, but explained how it affects kids in a positive way. 1. Manipulating Children: Kohn to prove his point within the first claim he makes, he quotes a professor at the University of Northern Iowa, which called this approach â€Å"sugar-coated control†, that get children to comply with adults’ wishes. Strain and Joseph, on the other hand use common reasoning to refute Kohns’ point, stating that of course it is wrong for adults to make children engage in: â€Å"developmentally inappropriate and nonfunctional behaviors†, but of course if used the right way it could encourage the repetition of positive behavior that in the long run will benefit kids. Also, Kohn mentions that it could maybe having a conversation with kids instead of praising could actually make them understand the point of doing an act. The opposition quickly replies by stating that such conversation could even cause confusion in children of young ages. 2. Creating Praise Junkies: It is not hard to understand the clear point Kohn makes in his second claim, by praising kids we make them dependent of us, and our own judgment. But he goes to extend and brings the words of a researcher at the University of Florida to support his claim. He suggested that students that are praised lavishly when answering a question right, were more tentative with their responses, or scared that they could be wrong and the teacher would disagree with them making them feel insecure. The weak rebuttal to this claim make by the opposing authors tries to incorporate nameless evidence and decades of research that prove Kohns’ point to be wrong, but do not go on to named them or explain them. They tried to argue the fact that indeed is the lack of praising that causes poor self-esteem and poor adult outcomes. . Stealing a Childs’ Pleasure: Kohn to prove his third point he incorporates a personal experience of his daughter which clearly is guided to the audience. He explained how she wants her daughter to instead of looking up to him for a verdict on an act to share her accomplished pleasure with him. Strain and Joseph, argue back again with nameless evidence the fact that positive reinforcement is the key in which kids learn t o take pride in their own actions. Even with the lack of evidence from their part, we cannot ignore that kids will always need guidance at first which makes this is a very strong point. 4. Losing Interest: oh this claim both authors of both article have a very different idea on what the own claim presents; none of them bring outside sources our measurable evidence for us to take account. 5. Reducing Achievement: Praising does indeed create pressure; it’s like an image that one has to keep up with. Kohn and researchers as we mentions have found that praising creates pressure, and pressure gets in the way of getting things done. Strain and Joseph end this debate by stating once again that positive reinforcement only strengthens behaviors wanted. To conclude, as we can see both sides introduce great arguments to their part. And in fact, positive reinforcement increases a desirable behavior as Strain and Joseph have been arguing. But also in fact it could also have negative outcomes not just for children, but for any subject. The most important thing we get from this is the fact for which we use positive reinforcement, our motives and how we apply it in life, and specially our kids. Positive Praising In conclusion, after reviewing both arguments we can clearly state the fact that positive reinforcement truly encourages a desirable behavior. We can also clearly state the fact that practicing positive reinforcement (praising) in children, could be a good or a bad, on the same account it could bring positive outcomes or negative outcomes. Children are learning sponges, and as long as guide our kids appropriately there should be no worries. As long as we understand the reason we use praising, our motives, and how we use it in our children but for their own benefit, we all will live in a better world. . How to cite Praising Children, Essay examples

Islam and Christianity an Example by

Islam and Christianity Introduction: Need essay sample on "Islam and Christianity" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed There exist many similarities and differences between the Islam religion and Christianity, the two religions have different religious teachings which lead to the difference in the two religions, the Islam religion uses the Quran while the Christians use the holy bible which are both different in their contents despite having some similarities. This paper discusses the similarities and difference of these two religions. Similarities in Islam and Christianity: The similarities will be analyzed in terms of their religious practices, code of conduct and basic concepts in Islam and Christianity. Creation: Both Islam and Christianity believe that God created the earth and the heavens in six days, the Quran and the Holy Bible both have the same sequence of the creation of earth and all the animals and man, the two holy books also are similar in that they agree that God created the heaven in the beginning. The story of Adam and Eve is also similar in both holy books and also the story of Moses and the Israelites, this include the Ten Commandments given to Moses on Mount Sinai. In the holy bible the story of creation is in the book of Genesis 1:14 while the story of creation is Quran 35:13 according to the holy book of the Islam. Commandments: The Bible has its ten commandments which were given to Moses, the Quran also has similar commandments which they acknowledge were given to Moses, the ten commandments are similar to those of the holy bible, therefore the two are similar in that their two holy books have the ten commandments given by God to Moses. In the Quran the story of Moses is in Quran 7:145 while in the bible the same is in the book of Exodus 24:12. Incest and marriage: The two holy books also prohibit marriages to members of the same family, the bible prohibits the marriage of close relatives including your mother or father and your sister or brother, the Quran also prohibits such marriages of close relatives, and therefore they both are against marriages of close relatives. In Quran 4:24 we find the prohibition of such marriages while in the bible this is in the book of Leviticus 18:6 of the holy bible. Monotheism and believes: Both Islam and Christianity believe that there is only one God; they believe that God is omniscient and omnipotent and he is the creator of the universe. The Quran and the Bible also analyze a history where man and God made covenants with god this covenants were agreements between God and man. The two religions also believe that there is satan who at the end of the world will be defeated by God and that there are two destinies for man either hell or heaven which will depend on the deeds of person in the world. Both Christianity and Islam believe that man has a soul which remains of the person even after death. The two also believe that there are angles that are in heaven with God, the angels are servants who act as massagers of God, and they also believe that satan is evil and an enemy to human beings who has evil spirits that follow him. This is the Quran 15:29 where it describes the existence of satan. Both Islam and Christianity believe that Jesus who the Islam refer to as Muhammad was born by the Virgin Mary and that he died and he will come again at the end of the world, however the Islam religion refer to Jesus as a prophet of Allah while the Christians refer to Jesus as the son of God and also acknowledge the existence of prophets such as Elijah and Jeremiah, therefore the two religions believe that there existed prophets whose work was to communicate to the people what God had said to them. Faith: The two religions believe that there is need to believe and have faith because proclaiming that you believe is not faith, one has to have faith so that things will work out, they also believe that human beings have rights and therefore they prohibit such actions as murder, theft and violence, the two religions also forbid adultery and fornication, and that parents have special rights and they deserve to be respected and obeyed. Also the laws of the society must be obeyed. The two religions also believe that one will receive rewards from God for doing charity work and also helping those in needs, they also believe in fasting and deprivation of oneself as a way to get rewards from God. The church and the mosque: The two both believe that the holy place i.e. mosque and church are holy and this is the place to meet once per week to pray and worship God, players are ways in which man communicates with God for both religions, according to the Muslim they must attend the salat on Friday and to the Christians a church service is held on Sunday. Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ on 25th December while the Muslims celebrate the birth of Prophet Muhammad on 12th Rabi awwal which is the Islam calendar, therefore the two religions believe in the birth of Jesus although the time of the year they celebrate his birth is different. Differences between Islam and Christianity: Christianity believe in the trinity while the Islam do not, Christians believe in the existence of God, the Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ, Christians also believe that Jesus is the son of God and therefore he himself is God, for the Islams Jesus was a prophet and the do not believe in the trinity. Therefore the Islam religion believes that Jesus was never crucified but was taken by God while the Christians believe that Jesus who was the son of God was crucified by the Jews. Jesus crucified: The Christians believe that Jesus Christ was crucified by the Jews while the Islam religion does not believe that Jesus was crucified, the Islam believe that Jesus was taken up by God and was never crucified by the Jews. Islams believe that Jesus was Allahs prophet while the Christians believe that Jesus was Gods son born of the Virgin Mary who was to be crucified to save human so that their sins would be forgiven. The story of Jesus being taken up by God is in the Quran 4:157 while the book of Luke in the holy bible describes the life and death of Jesus. Resurrection: The Christians believe that Jesus was crucified and on the third day he resurrected from the dead and after rose to heaven to sit on the right side of Gods throne, the Islam do not believe that Jesus was crucified and they believe that Jesus was taken up by God. This is in the book of Luke and Mathew of the holy bible which describe the life of Jesus Christ. Sins: The Islams believe that man is born pure of no sin and that a person is responsible for the sins he commits, however to the Christians man is born in the original sin which was committed by Adam and Eve, the original sin is forgiven once a person is baptized and takes the sacrament of baptism. Holy book: The Christians believe that the Holy bible was written by writers who were inspired by the Devine wind, the Islam believe that the Quran is free of any mistakes and that it is accurate, it was written by writers for over a period of 23 years and contains what God has spoken and angle Gabriel was sent to give messages to the writers of the Quran. The Islam believes that the Quran is as it was originally written and no changes were made on words, however to Christians the holy bible has under went some changes in 324 AD where there was the introduction of the New Testament and also the Old Testament. This is according to the book by Ulfat Aziz Samad (1970) which describes the difference between Islam and Christianity page 14. Further there exist many differences in the stories narrated by the Quran and the holy bible, the only similar stories include the Adam and Eve story and the story of Moses and the Israelites, and the others are different in both holy books. Moral codes of Islam and Christians: Christians consume the fresh of pigs while for the Islam the religious teachings prohibit the consumption of pigs, the consumption of alcohol in Islam is completely prohibited but Christians do not prohibit alcohol consumption, other prohibitions in Islam religion include the free mixing with the opposite sex, however Christians do not prohibit mixing with the opposite sex. Therefore the two religions are different in that the Islam has more prohibitions to what the people consume but to Christians nothing is prohibited to consume. This is according to the book by Hans Kochler (2000) named The Concept of Monotheism in Islam and Christianity page 23. Governance and religion: According to the book by Hans Kochler (2000) page 41 The Islam religion believes that there should be no difference between governance and religion, this is because they believe that the Quran was written without any errors and provides a guideline to leadership, however for Christians their governance is by secular governance, this means that there are attachments of governance with religion. Other differences include daily rituals where Islam religion has their daily rituals well written down while for Christian there are no such daily rituals. Conclusion: From the above discussion there are many differences and similarities that exist between Christianity and Islam, Islam have their holy place of player and worship which is referred to as the mosque while Christians go to church, the Islam community prohibits the consumption of pig fresh while the Christians do not prohibit the consumption of any animal fresh. Other differences include their reference to Jesus Christ, to Christians Jesus Christ was the son of god while to the Islam Jesus Christ was a prophet who was never crucified but was taken by god to heaven. References: Muslim Canada organization (2007) differences between Islam and Christianity, retrieved on 18th August, available at www.muslim-canada.org/islam_christianity.html Ulfat Aziz Samad (1970) Islam and Christianity, Ahmadiyyah Anjuman publishers, Michigan Hans Kochler (2000) The Concept of Monotheism in Islam and Christianity, McGraw hill, New York