Free Essays on Case Study

Identifying Data and Reason Referral: Lenny Peters is a 48 year-old Caucasian gay male recently admitted for inpatient psychiatric treatment. He was referred for a psychological testing by his psychiatrist to assist in diagnostic clarification regarding personality dynamics and/or Axis I pathology. Evaluation Instruments and Sources of Information: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Second Edition (MMPI-2) Clinical Interview Background Information: Developmental History: The information collected is compliments of a self-report by Mr. Lenny Peters. Mr. Peters, an only child, confirms that his mother did not report having a complicated birth or suffer hardships while caring for Lenny during his early developmental stages. He claims that he â€Å"grew up with everything† and also admitted being the â€Å"spoiled Jewish kid on the block.† He reports being loved by his mother and father, but his relationship with his father was not as secure as his relationship with his mother. Family History and Significant Relationships: Mr. Peters did not report of any complications such as sexual or physical abuse as a child. His problems began to surface once he has revealed his sexual orientation. He expressed that although his mother got over the gay issue quickly, being that he â€Å"is her baby†, his father had a harder time adjusting to having his only son claim to be a homosexual. He expressed that he and his father were never close and that his father was a â€Å"man’s man† which may have contributed to their lack of closeness. Mr. Peters explains that his father died 14 months ago due to an aneurism, and that his mother has â€Å"lost her spark and love of life.† It is not clear if Mrs. Peters is suffering through these feelings due to the loss of her husband or not. Living alone, Mr. Peters claims that he is not in a current relationship, but does participate in some casual dating. He expresses that he is experien... Free Essays on Case Study Free Essays on Case Study Identifying Data and Reason Referral: Lenny Peters is a 48 year-old Caucasian gay male recently admitted for inpatient psychiatric treatment. He was referred for a psychological testing by his psychiatrist to assist in diagnostic clarification regarding personality dynamics and/or Axis I pathology. Evaluation Instruments and Sources of Information: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Second Edition (MMPI-2) Clinical Interview Background Information: Developmental History: The information collected is compliments of a self-report by Mr. Lenny Peters. Mr. Peters, an only child, confirms that his mother did not report having a complicated birth or suffer hardships while caring for Lenny during his early developmental stages. He claims that he â€Å"grew up with everything† and also admitted being the â€Å"spoiled Jewish kid on the block.† He reports being loved by his mother and father, but his relationship with his father was not as secure as his relationship with his mother. Family History and Significant Relationships: Mr. Peters did not report of any complications such as sexual or physical abuse as a child. His problems began to surface once he has revealed his sexual orientation. He expressed that although his mother got over the gay issue quickly, being that he â€Å"is her baby†, his father had a harder time adjusting to having his only son claim to be a homosexual. He expressed that he and his father were never close and that his father was a â€Å"man’s man† which may have contributed to their lack of closeness. Mr. Peters explains that his father died 14 months ago due to an aneurism, and that his mother has â€Å"lost her spark and love of life.† It is not clear if Mrs. Peters is suffering through these feelings due to the loss of her husband or not. Living alone, Mr. Peters claims that he is not in a current relationship, but does participate in some casual dating. He expresses that he is experien... Free Essays on Case Study The article that I read was found in the October 29 issue of the Wall Street Journal. This article is called, â€Å"Verizon Net Drops, But Wireless Area Sees Revenue Rise.† Verizon Communications Inc. reported that third-quarter net income fell fifty-nine percent from the year-earlier period, when results were helped by asset sales and tax benefits (p.B7). However, there was an eighteen percent jump in revenue at the wireless affiliate. Verizon’s total number of residential phone lines fell 3.5%, business lines declined 4.6%, and revenue in the U.S. wireline division was down 4.1%, which was the steepest decline of this year (p.B7). Like other regional telecommunications companies, Verizon continues to suffer from declines in usage of traditional phone services as people rely more on cell phones and the Internet (p.B7). Verizon Wireless had a net gain of 1.3 million retail subscribers and customer growth accelerated from the first and second quarters. Also, Verizon is taking customers from rival carriers like Sprint PCS and Cingular. Therefore, Verizon needs to focus most of its attention to the wireless affiliate because that’s what is giving Verizon a competitive advantage. Last month, Verizon cut its earnings forecast for the year, as well as expenses associated with a new labor contract and heady growth in the wireless business (p.B7). Verizon will have to create something new for the phone company and to do so they might have to increase the expenses a little to be more technologically advanced. However, their net income would increase and they would get more customers. This article parallels the subject matter covered in business organization and management because it involves the aspects of innovation and gaining a competitive advantage over similar companies. Verizon’s net income is going down because everyone has a cell phone instead of a regular phone these days. Venison was innovative when they creat... Free Essays on Case Study Background I have had the privilege to follow around Bryson Bolling who is a senior at Kokomo High School in Kokomo, IN. I live in Kokomo where I was born and raised and went to high school with Bryson’s brother Ryan. Bryson and I before this project have never spoken. He was born 6/23/86 in Kokomo, IN where he has been living his whole life. He has attended Kokomo Center Schools his whole life including Boulevard Elementary, Maple Crest Middle School, and now is attending Kokomo High School and will graduate this spring. He is from a middle class family background where his mother and father have worked ever since he can remember. He has a 2.9 GPA and has always studied to make his grades. He scored a 1020 on his SAT and a 23 on his ACT. He has been accepted and is planning to join the freshman class at Indiana University in Kokomo (IUK) and after that move on to a larger campus maybe IU or Purdue. He is undecided on what he plans to study but he is leaning towards business. Bryson has one older sister whose name is Brittany and one older brother who is my friend Ryan. Ryan and I went to high school together and have kept in touch since he went to IU and I am attending IUPUI. His older sister Brittany graduated from Kokomo High School in 2003 and is not going to college. His parents have been married for 25 years and have lived in Kokomo all their lives. He works at a local YMCA as a basketball referee for younger kids’ games. A job that is not as challenging as it is rewarding for him seeing little kids playing basketball. He is in the process of trying out for the varsity basketball team himself while working and going to school. He is also planning to try out for the baseball team in the spring. He was brought up Lutheran and goes to church regularly. His family is not super religious but they do attend church every Sunday and believe in God. He is however in a youth group at his church that gets...

The Original Bill of Rights Had 12 Amendments, Not 10

The Original Bill of Rights Had 12 Amendments, Not 10 How many amendments are in the Bill of Rights? If you answered ten, you are right. But if you visit the Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom at the National Archives Museum in Washington, DC, you will see that the original copy of the Bill of Rights sent to states for ratification had twelve amendments. Fast Facts The  Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution.The Bill of Rights establishes specific restrictions and prohibitions on the powers of the  federal government.The Bill of Rights was created in response to demands from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties already considered  natural rights, such as the rights to speak and worship freely.The Bill of Rights, originally in the form of 12 amendments was submitted to the legislatures of the states for their consideration on September 28, 1789, and was ratified by the required three-fourths (then 11) states in the form of 10 amendments on December 15, 1791. What is the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is actually the popular name for a joint resolution passed by the first U.S. Congress on September 25, 1789. The resolution proposed the first set of amendments to the Constitution. Then as now, the process of amending the Constitution required the resolution to be ratified or approved by at least three-fourths the states. Unlike the ten amendments we know and cherish today as the Bill of Rights, the resolution sent to the states for ratification in 1789 proposed twelve amendments.When the votes of the 11 states were finally counted on December 15, 1791, only the last 10 of the 12 amendments had been ratified. Thus, the original third amendment, establishing freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition, and the right to a fair and speedy trial became todays First Amendment. Imagine 6,000 Members of Congress Rather than establishing rights and freedoms, the first amendment as voted on by the states in the original Bill of Rights proposed a ratio by which to determine the number of people to be represented by each member of the House of Representatives. The original first amendment (not ratified) read: After the first enumeration required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons. Had the amendment been ratified, the number of members of the House of Representatives could by now be over 6,000, compared to the present 435. As apportioned by the latest  Census, each member of the House currently represents about 650,000 people. The Original Second Amendment was About Money, not Guns The original second amendment as voted on, but rejected by the states in 1789, addressed congressional pay, rather than the right of the people to possess firearms. The original second amendment (not ratified) read: No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened. Though not ratified at the time, the original second amendment finally made its way into the Constitution in 1992, ratified as the 27th Amendment, a full 203 years after it was first proposed. And So the Third Became the First As a result of the failure of the states to ratify the original first and second amendments in 1791, the original third amendment became a part of the Constitution as the First Amendment we cherish today.   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Background Delegates to the Constitutional Convention in 1787 considered but defeated a proposal to include a bill of rights in the initial version of the Constitution. This resulted in a  heated debate during the ratification process.The Federalists, who supported the Constitution as written, felt a bill of rights was not needed because the Constitution intentionally limited the powers of the federal government to interfere with the rights of the states, most of which had already adopted bills of rights. The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, argued in favor of the Bill of Rights, believing that the central government could not exist or function without a clearly established list of rights guaranteed to the people. (See: The Federalist Papers)Some of the states hesitated to ratify the Constitution without a bill of rights. During the ratification process, the people and the state legislatures called for the first Congress serving under the new Constitution in 1789 to consider an d put forward a bill of rights. According to the National Archives, the then 11 states began the process of ratifying the Bill of Rights by holding a referendum, asking its voters to approve or reject each of the 12 proposed amendments. Ratification of any amendment by at least three-quarters of the states meant acceptance of that amendment. Six weeks after receiving the Bill of Rights resolution, North Carolina ratified the Constitution. (North Carolina had resisted ratifying the Constitution because it did not guarantee individual rights.) During this process, Vermont became the first state to join the Union after the Constitution was ratified, and Rhode Island (the lone holdout) also joined. Each state tallied its votes and forwarded the results to Congress. Sources and Further Reference â€Å"The Charters of Freedom: The Bill of Rights.† Washington, DC. National Archives and Records Administration.â€Å"James Madison’s Proposed Amendments to the Constitution, June 8, 1789.† Washington, DC. National Archives and Records Administration.Lloyd, Gordon. â€Å"Introduction to the Constitutional Convention.† Teaching American History.